Legislature(1997 - 1998)

05/04/1998 09:20 AM Senate FIN

Audio Topic
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CALL OF THE CHAIR - CONVENE AFTER MAJORITY
CAUCUS (AFTER 5:30 PM)
txt
MINUTES                                                                        
SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE                                                       
4 May, 1998                                                                    
9:20 a.m.                                                                      
                                                                               
TAPES                                                                          
                                                                               
SFC 98  # 155, Side A (000-566)                                                
                                                                               
                                                                               
CALL TO ORDER                                                                  
                                                                               
Senator Bert Sharp, Co-Chair, convened the meeting at                          
approximately 9:20 a.m.                                                        
                                                                               
                                                                               
PRESENT                                                                        
                                                                               
In addition to Co-Chair Sharp, Senators Pearce, Donley,                        
Torgerson, Adams, Parnell and Phillips were present when the                   
meeting was convened.                                                          
                                                                               
Also Attending:  Senator LYDA GREEN; Senator JERRY MACKIE;                     
Representative JOHN DAVIES; Representative MARK HANLEY;                        
Representative NORM ROKEBERG; ANNALEE MCCONNELL, Director,                     
Office of Management and Budget, Office of the Governor;                       
SHARON BARTON, Director, Division of Administration,                           
Department of Administration; JUANITA HENSLEY,                                 
Administrator, Division of Motor Vehicles, DOA ; KAREN                         
REHFELD, Director, Division of Education Support Services,                     
Department of Education; JANET CLARKE, Director, Division of                   
Administrative Services, Department of Health and Social                       
Services; JOHN BITTNEY, Alaska Housing Finance Corporation,                    
Department of Revenue; WENDY REDMOND, Vice President,                          
University Relations, University of Alaska; CHRIS                              
CHRISTENSEN, Staff Council, Alaska Court System; TAM COOK,                     
Director, Legal Services, Legislative Affairs Agency; MIKE                     
GREANY, Director, Division of Legislative Finance; GINGER                      
PATTON and JIM HAUCK, Fiscal Analysts, DLF; and aides to                       
committee members and other members of the Legislature.                        
                                                                               
                                                                               
via Teleconference:  DAN FAUSKE, Alaska Housing Finance                        
Corporation, Department of Revenue.                                            
                                                                               
                                                                               
SUMMARY INFORMATION                                                            
                                                                               
                                                                               
SENATE BILL NO. 360                                                            
"An Act authorizing the issuance of bonds in the amount                        
of $257,600,000 by the Alaska Housing Finance                                  
Corporation for certain capital projects; relating to                          
those bonds and to the appropriation of revenue of the                         
Alaska Housing Finance Corporation; and providing for                          
an effective date."                                                            
                                                                               
                                                                               
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 360(FIN)                                                
"An Act authorizing the issuance of bonds by the Alaska                        
Housing Finance Corporation for certain capital                                
projects; relating to those bonds and to the                                   
appropriation of revenue of the Alaska Housing Finance                         
Corporation; and providing for an effective date."                             
                                                                               
                                                                               
Co-Chair Sharp announced his intention to cover the capital                    
budget and the AHFC bond bill.  If time permitted, other                       
bills would be addressed.                                                      
                                                                               
TAM COOK, Director of Legal Services, Legislative Affairs                      
Agency was invited to speak to the committee about the                         
latest committee substitute of SB 231.  She spoke as                           
follows:                                                                       
                                                                               
"Mr. Chair and members of the committee, the committee                         
substitute that you have in front of you does not make a                       
great many changes to the original bill. I will try to                         
identify the changes that are made and give an explanation                     
of those."                                                                     
                                                                               
"On page two the significant change that is made is the                        
insertion of subsection E.  Subsection E contains a pledge                     
by the state to the holders of bonds of AHFC that the state                    
will not appropriate or transfer money during a current                        
fiscal year from AHFC that exceeds the corporation's net                       
income for the immediately preceding fiscal year.  So that                     
essentially the state is pledging to take no more money than                   
what would be available from the - what would have been the                    
net income from the preceding fiscal year minus the amount                     
it is required to pay off the bonding costs that are                           
associated with this bill here."                                               
                                                                               
"So, what this is, is substantive law to that extent it is                     
no longer as an intent section.  It is substantive in                          
effect.  There is the provision that AHFC may tell the state                   
that it has additional unrestricted revenue.  If it does the                   
state possibly could appropriate that."                                        
                                                                               
"In addition, you will notice Section 3 has been added.  And                   
it is a repealer provision, which did not exist, in the                        
original bill.  This section repeals the bill to July 1 year                   
2006.  Since the bond must mature under Section 2 not later                    
than January 1, 2116, it's possible that this repeal could                     
be changed to January 1.  To be on the safe side, I put the                    
repeal July 1, 2006.  The reason I added the repealer is so                    
that Section E is not of continuing duration.  Section E                       
being the pledge of the state not to appropriate more                          
revenue out of AHFC than is permitted under the formula."                      
                                                                               
"And that in principle is the only significant change in                       
this CS as compared to the original bill that was                              
introduced."                                                                   
                                                                               
Senator Adams supported the capital projects that this bill                    
would encompass.  However, he asked about the wording saying                   
that one Legislature could bind and another future                             
Legislature refuse to bind on this type of appropriation.                      
                                                                               
Ms. Cook was uncertain how a court challenge would be ruled                    
upon if a future Legislature passed legislation that                           
violated the terms of Section E.  It was possible that a                       
court would find the appropriation was valid, she                              
speculated, even if it did violate the provision.  She                         
theorized that if the Legislature appropriated an amount                       
that was greater than the formula permitted in the                             
subsection for a particular year, but was able to show                         
factually that AHFC had remaining assets that were                             
sufficient to fully cover all the bonded obligations, the                      
court might find that the addition appropriation did not                       
actually impair a contract to the bond holder.  She offered                    
another argument that the Legislature could not modify                         
substantive law on appropriations.  If the Legislature was                     
to simply enact an appropriation of AHFC assets that was                       
greater than the amount permitted in Subsection E, an                          
argument could be made that essentially the Legislature was                    
either suspending or repealing the substantive effect of E                     
in an appropriations bill and therefore, the appropriation                     
was invalid, according to Ms. Cook.                                            
                                                                               
She summarized that a couple of theories that could be made                    
to attack an appropriation in excess of the formula and                        
there was also the overriding power of the Legislature's                       
purse on the other side, which might be used to defend such                    
an appropriation.  She guessed that the issue would probably                   
not come up unless the Legislature elected to attempt to                       
appropriate more than the formula permitted.                                   
                                                                               
Senator Adams requested suggested language the committee                       
could use to prevent a challenge to the provisions.  Ms.                       
Cook responded that there was a tension between the                            
constitutional provisions and she had nothing to suggest                       
that would help.  Assuming that the goal of the Legislature                    
was to provide security in the marketplace for the bonds,                      
she felt that there was no alternative but to include the                      
provision to reassure the bondholders.  She still had some                     
legal question as to how enforceable the provision would be.                   
                                                                               
DAN FAUSKE from the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation                         
joined the discussion via off-net teleconference.  He told                     
the committee bond council was available for comment and                       
that he had a statement from the corporation's financial                       
advisor.                                                                       
                                                                               
Co-Chair Sharp updated the committee members that several                      
meetings had been held with his office, AHFC, bond council                     
and other Department of Revenue and Department of Law                          
representatives as the first versions of the bill were                         
drafted.  As a result of later discussions, Subsection E was                   
added.  He explained that the process was a continuous                         
evolution to write language that was acceptable to both the                    
Legislature and AHFC.                                                          
                                                                               
The committee invited JOHN BITTNEY from AHFC to speak to the                   
latest CS.  He commented as follows:                                           
                                                                               
"We did submitted this morning, a fiscal note for the piece                    
of legislation that perhaps as a suggestion I could just                       
brief you on that."                                                            
                                                                               
"Assuming it's in your packets, Mr. Chairman, we have                          
requested one position at the corporation, which would be a                    
finance officer to track and monitor the expenditures of                       
these bond proceeds throughout the agency.  We feel this is                    
necessary in order to monitor those expenditures.                              
Apparently there are restrictions of course, on the use of                     
bond proceeds. And therefore there will be some reporting                      
requirements on AHFC about the use of those. As well as we                     
anticipate that there's probably going to be a number of                       
reports that the state, Legislature are going to be asking                     
for over time as far as how the use of these of funds is                       
going."                                                                        
                                                                               
"That's pretty much just it in a nutshell, Mr. Chairman.                       
It's just one position for a Range 22 Finance Officer with                     
some small amounts for travel, equipment and the like."                        
                                                                               
Co-Chair Sharp agreed that extra work would be added because                   
of Section B of the bill, where AHFC was asked to coordinate                   
with various agencies on the projects.                                         
                                                                               
Mr. Fauske spoke about the provisions in the proposed                          
Section E as follows:                                                          
                                                                               
"The language in E has come a long ways towards the position                   
that the corporation wanted to maintain that a pledge was                      
essential for us to move forward an issue that's done on                       
behalf of the state of deferred maintenance - all the                          
projects that are listed.  I have Eric Wolford (ph) here and                   
one of the concerns is that we have a little bit more time                     
to read it and possibly come back with any language we feel                    
might be essential to help clarify this if that'd be the                       
choice of the advice of our council.                                           
                                                                               
"I would like to commend thought that this has come a long                     
ways towards the number one concern we had on making sure                      
that AHFC be allowed to maintain the credit rating at its                      
going concerned status.  So that kinda resulted that a                         
better product is brought back to the state in reference to                    
the bonds that we would issue.  That has been our concern                      
all along is to make sure that we have the tools to work                       
with, with the financial community so that Alaska is best                      
served. And this has come a long ways towards that."                           
                                                                               
Co-Chair Sharp told Mr. Fauske that the committee would                        
continue work on the bill to keep the legislative process                      
moving.  AHFC would have opportunities to make further                         
suggestions to the committee or else in the other body, when                   
the bill reached it, he said.                                                  
                                                                               
Senator Pearce referred to a portion of Section E, which she                   
violently opposed.  She asked if AHFC had ever come close to                   
defaulting on any loan payment.                                                
                                                                               
Mr. Fauske replied that he didn't have any knowledge except                    
for an instance two years before when the Legislative Audit                    
proposed making a $435 million withdrawal.  The corporation                    
was immediately placed on credit watch.  He was not aware of                   
and defaults however.                                                          
                                                                               
Senator Pearce wanted to know if there was any true                            
financial repercussion to the state as a result of the                         
audit.  Mr. Fauske described the actual status compared to                     
ideal circumstances financial analysts would prefer.  He                       
said that the issuance of dept as proposed in this bill was                    
a different type of obligation than previous AHFC                              
circumstances.                                                                 
                                                                               
Senator Pearce stressed that neither AHFC nor the                              
Legislature had ever failed to step forward to cover debt                      
reimbursement.  Mr. Fauske appreciated the comment but                         
pointed out the difference with this situation.  He pointed                    
out the trend with Wall Street investment advisers and other                   
investors regarding housing authorities use by legislatures                    
to cover agency costs in other states besides Alaska.                          
                                                                               
He added that investors were leery of issues where there                       
wasn't something set to insure their investment was                            
protected and show what the operation was to entail.  It                       
wasn't so much a criticism by AHFC, just an attempt to                         
insure security for the investor, he stated.  Investors were                   
very impressed with intent language for the corporation                        
during the last four-year period, according to Mr. Fauske.                     
                                                                               
Senator Adams pointed out that many of the projects in the                     
bill were sidelined from typical AHFC programs and wanted to                   
know the effect it would have on the bond rating.  Mr.                         
Fauske felt confident that with the discussed amount and                       
type of projects proposed the bond rating should be                            
maintained or strengthened.                                                    
                                                                               
Senator Adams offered that once this pattern of funding was                    
started, it would be hard to stop.  He requested a plan for                    
future years showing the amount of money that could be used                    
for this purpose and not harm the agency or its bond rating.                   
Mr. Fauske replied that some of that information was                           
included with the current bill and that the corporation                        
would give him more information.                                               
                                                                               
Senator Parnell moved for adoption of CS SB 360 Version H.                     
Senator Pearce objected.                                                       
                                                                               
Senator Pearce said she didn't like the legislative intent                     
language.  She stressed that the legislature had never                         
failed to meet its obligations under debt retirement.  She                     
thought the language with too far and the original language                    
was clear.  She wasn't opposed to adding a repealer, but did                   
not want the legislature to give up the power of                               
appropriation.                                                                 
                                                                               
Senator Adams suggested that the bill would be repealed in                     
the year 2006 even without the language.                                       
                                                                               
Senator Pearce agreed but noted that until then, the                           
legislature would give up its appropriation power, which she                   
did not approve.                                                               
                                                                               
Co-Chair Sharp appreciated Senator Pearce's reluctance to                      
accept Section E.  However, he felt that forcing the issue                     
was not in the best interest.  He spoke of the insurance and                   
comfort given to investors with the pledge.  After all, he                     
commented, the bonds had to be sold and given the best                         
interest rates.  He did agree with Senator Pearce that if                      
AHFC had good years in the near future, the legislature                        
might have some difficulty participating in the profits.                       
                                                                               
Senator Donley requested some time to think about the                          
matter.                                                                        
                                                                               
Co-Chair Sharp reminded the committee this bill would be                       
linked with the capital budget bill.  He preferred to not                      
move either bill from committee until both were complete.                      
Funds appropriated in the capital budget would need to come                    
from the bonds, he pointed out.                                                
                                                                               
Senator Pearce asked if the proposed projected needed to be                    
rolled into SB 360.  Co-Chair Sharp said committee members                     
and other senators would be more comfortable knowing what                      
projects the bonds authorized.                                                 
                                                                               
Senator Parnell withdrew his motion to adopt CS SB 360                         
Version H.  There was no objection and it was so ordered.                      
                                                                               
Co-Chair Sharp ordered the bill held in committee.                             
                                                                               
Senator Pearce requested a copy of the Legislative Audit                       
mentioned earlier.                                                             
                                                                               
The committee took an At Ease at approximately 9:45 a.m.,                      
resuming at approximately 10:20 a.m.                                           
                                                                               
                                                                               
SENATE BILL NO. 231                                                            
"An Act making and amending capital appropriations and                         
reappropriations and capitalizing funds; and providing                         
for an effective date."                                                        
                                                                               
                                                                               
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 231(FIN)                                                
"An Act making and amending capital, supplemental, and                         
other appropriations; making appropriations to                                 
capitalize funds; making appropriations under art. IX,                         
sec. 17(c), Constitution of the State of Alaska, from                          
the constitutional budget reserve fund; and providing                          
for an effective date."                                                        
                                                                               
                                                                               
The committee resumed consideration of amendments.  Co-Chair                   
Sharp announced the amendments to be addressed.                                
                                                                               
FRONT #10: Senator Torgerson moved for adoption.  Senator                      
Adams objected for a question.  Discussion was as follows.                     
                                                                               
Co-Chair Sharp spoke to the motion he sponsored.  He                           
explained this was a reappropriation of old railbelt energy                    
money that was appropriated in 1994.  There was $3 million                     
appropriated to the City of Seward as a loan.  That amount                     
had not been used and was available for reappropriation to                     
projects in the amendment, he told the committee.  He listed                   
the projects and pointed out that the communities were                         
matching at least fifty-percent of the project costs.                          
                                                                               
Senator Adams was concerned on the original loan to the City                   
of Seward for the transmission line to the Lawson station.                     
He wanted to know that the project had been taken care of.                     
Senator Torgerson assured him that the City of Seward found                    
an alternative funding source and no longer needed the                         
funds.                                                                         
                                                                               
Senator Adams removed his objection.  The amendment was                        
ADOPTED without objection.                                                     
                                                                               
DOT #2 REV REV:  Senator Donley moved for adoption.  Senator                   
Torgerson objected for explanation.  Discussion was as                         
follows.                                                                       
                                                                               
Senator Donley explained the change made since the previous                    
meeting was an adjustment to AMAT allocations and                              
appropriations.  He referred to the Ship Creek Trail, which                    
had been inadvertently deleted by the Department of                            
Transportation, but should have been included on the AMAT                      
list.                                                                          
                                                                               
Senator Adams had a question regarding page two, line 19.                      
He wanted to know if the funds listed were new general fund                    
money or utilized within the AMAT system.                                      
                                                                               
Senator Donley asked what was Senator Adams' definition of                     
AMAT money.  Senator Adams replied it was more that                            
presently appropriated.                                                        
                                                                               
There was further debate between the two senators.                             
                                                                               
The committee took a brief At Ease at approximately 10:25                      
a.m.                                                                           
                                                                               
TAPE MALFUNCTION - portion of meeting not recorded                             
                                                                               
The amendment was ADOPTED by a vote of 6-1.  Senator Adams                     
cast the nay vote.                                                             
                                                                               
BOND #2: Senator Pearce moved for adoption. Senator Adams                      
objected.  Discussion was as follows.                                          
                                                                               
Co-Chair Sharp spoke to the amendment he sponsored.  Senator                   
Adams asked about changes to the Fish and Wildlife                             
Protection Aircraft language on page 25.                                       
                                                                               
Senator Parnell explained the change was to correct language                   
to clarify the project was for the Department of Fish and                      
Game rather than the Department of Public Safety; Division                     
of Wildlife Protection.                                                        
                                                                               
Senator Adams removed his objection.                                           
                                                                               
Co-Chair Sharp noted the last paragraph had been removed.                      
                                                                               
The amendment was ADOPTED without objection.                                   
                                                                               
HSS #2: Senator Torgerson said he would not offer the                          
amendment action taken with BOND #2.                                           
                                                                               
HSS #7: Senator Adams said he would not offer the amendment                    
due to action taken with BOND #2.                                              
                                                                               
DOA #5: Senator Phillips moved for adoption.  It was pointed                   
out that the amendment was identical to DOA #4 already acted                   
upon.  Senator Phillips withdrew his motion.                                   
                                                                               
DOA #4: Senator Phillips moved to rescind action taken                         
earlier.                                                                       
                                                                               
Senator Phillips spoke about the request to use retirement                     
and benefits funds to purchase new office furniture for the                    
Division of Retirement and Benefits.                                           
                                                                               
Without objection, action taken on DOA #4 was rescinded.                       
                                                                               
Senator Phillips moved for adoption.  Without objection, the                   
amendment was ADOPTED.                                                         
                                                                               
The committee discussed another Department of Administration                   
capital budget request for Electronic Commerce equipment, a                    
Lease Database using AIDA funds.  At the request of Senator                    
Phillips, SHARON BARTON, Director of the Division of                           
Administrative Services, DOA, came to the table.                               
                                                                               
Ms. Barton spoke of the need for this project and the                          
inability to use AIDA funds.  She asked if general funds                       
could be used instead.                                                         
                                                                               
Co-Chair Sharp replied that other users should pay for the                     
project through receipts.  If not, he concluded the issue                      
was dead.                                                                      
                                                                               
Ms. Barton countered that without the program, agencies                        
would be faced with between $700,000 to $1,300,000 in                          
additional new charge-backs in FY 99.  That would translate                    
into program reductions, she speculated.  She added that the                   
projects, if undertook, would result in cost savings in the                    
future.                                                                        
                                                                               
Co-Chair Sharp said the committee would consider removing                      
the project altogether if the agencies didn't think they                       
could fund it.                                                                 
                                                                               
The committee took an At Ease at approximately 10:40 a.m.                      
                                                                               
The meeting was turned over to Senator Phillips to chair.                      
                                                                               
                                                                               
CS FOR HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 2(JUD)                                       
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the State                        
of Alaska relating to repeal of regulations by the                             
legislature.                                                                   
                                                                               
Representative NORM ROKEBERG, sponsor of the bill, was                         
invited to join the committee to speak to the constitutional                   
amendment.  He testified as follows:                                           
                                                                               
"[Along with] Representative James from North Pole, [we are                    
the] two prime sponsors on this constitutional amendment to                    
return to the legislature its rightful ability to repeal                       
regulations by resolution, which was removed by the court in                   
1980 in the State of Alaska v. ALIVE Volunteer case."                          
                                                                               
"I think everybody's familiar with this.  I think the                          
difference this year by returning to voters, I believe I                       
have commitments from business groups around the state to                      
support the ballot initiative with some money to educate the                   
voters on the importance of the separation of powers and                       
rebalancing to equilibrium the balance between the                             
legislature and the executive branch."                                         
                                                                               
"With that, Mr. Chairman, I would ask that you favorably act                   
on this.  Its only got a $3,000 [undecipherable] fiscal                        
note."                                                                         
                                                                               
There were no other witnesses to testify on this bill and no                   
discussion by committee members.                                               
                                                                               
Senator Donley offered a motion to move from committee, HJR
2 with accompanying fiscal notes.  Without objection, it was                   
moved out of committee.                                                        
                                                                               
                                                                               
ADJOURNMENT                                                                    
                                                                               
Senator Phillips recessed the meeting at approximately 10:55                   
a.m. and did not resume.                                                       
SFC-98 (10) 5/4/98 am                                                          

Document Name Date/Time Subjects